![]() ![]() Additionally, notes will not have an effect on the way people see Tweets or our system recommendations. These notes are being intentionally kept separate from Twitter for now, while we build Birdwatch and gain confidence that it produces context people find helpful and appropriate. On this site, pilot participants can also rate the helpfulness of notes added by other contributors. In this first phase of the pilot, notes will only be visible on a separate Birdwatch site. Eventually we aim to make notes visible directly on Tweets for the global Twitter audience, when there is consensus from a broad and diverse set of contributors. We believe this approach has the potential to respond quickly when misleading information spreads, adding context that people trust and find valuable. That’s why today we’re introducing Birdwatch, a pilot in the US of a new community-driven approach to help address misleading information on Twitter.īirdwatch allows people to identify information in Tweets they believe is misleading and write notes that provide informative context. ![]() We also want to broaden the range of voices that are part of tackling this problem, and we believe a community-driven approach can help. We apply labels and add context to Tweets, but we don't want to limit efforts to circumstances where something breaks our rules or receives widespread public attention. ![]() People come to Twitter to stay informed, and they want credible information to help them do so. As of November 2022, Birdwatch is now Community Notes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |